{"id":628,"date":"2018-07-28T15:36:09","date_gmt":"2018-07-28T13:36:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/strafverteidiger-oldenburg.de\/?page_id=628"},"modified":"2018-07-28T16:10:07","modified_gmt":"2018-07-28T14:10:07","slug":"publications","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.strafverteidiger-oldenburg.de\/en\/publications\/","title":{"rendered":"PUBLICATIONS"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jens M\u00f6ckel<\/h2>\n
\n
<\/p>\n

I. Essays<\/h3>\n
    \n
  • Scope of liability of submission agreements, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2012, 3270-3274 (together with private lecturer Dr. Habil. Kristian F. Stoffers).<\/li>\n
  • Participating rights in the criminal procedure adhesion proceedings, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2013, 830-832 (together with private lecturer Dr. Habil. Kristian F. Stoffers).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    <\/div><\/div>\n

    <\/p>\n

    II. Comments on judgement<\/h3>\n
      \n
    • BGH, decision of 21.10.2008 – 3 StR 420\/08 (large-scale financial loss), in: StrafRechtsReport, 2009, 69.<\/li>\n
    • Higher Regional Court Oldenburg, Decision of 11.12.2009 – 1 pp. 197\/09 ([Shortterm] imprisonment and prohibition of excessiveness), in: StrafRechtsReport, 2010, 74-75.<\/li>\n
    • BGH, Decision of 10.01.2012 – 3 StR 400\/11 (Criminal Law: Refusal of judges for fear of bias), in: StrafRechtsReport, 2012, 221-223 (together with private lecturer Dr. Habil. Kristian F. Stoffers).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      <\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

      Dr. habil. Kristian F. Stoffers<\/h2>\n
      \n
      <\/p>\n

      I. Monographs<\/h3>\n
        \n
      • The phrase \u201cFocus of reproachability\u201d in the demarcation of doing and refraining?, Berlin, 1992, 499 p. (At the same time: Cologne, University, Dissertation, 1991).<\/li>\n
      • Termination of treatment between care law and criminal law – on the (criminal) legal significance of the guardianship court approval within the sense of \u00a7 1904 Civil Code, Frankfurt a. M., 2011, 779 p. (At the same time: Bielefeld, University, Habilitation Thesis, 2008).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        II. Essays<\/h3>\n
          \n
        • Threat of failure of a legally not offered act in the context of \u00a7\u00a7 240, 253 StGB, in: Juristische Rundschau, 1988, 492-497.<\/li>\n
        • Complicity and start of the trial, in: Monatsschrift f\u00fcr Deutsches Recht, 1989, 208-213.<\/li>\n
        • The right-wing figure \u201cFailure by doing nothing” (Part 1), in: Juristische Arbeitsbl\u00e4tter, 1992, 138-141.<\/li>\n
        • The right-wing figure \u201cFailure by doing nothing” (Part 2), in: Juristische Arbeitsbl\u00e4tter, 1992, 177-183.<\/li>\n
        • Euthanasia: Legal developments in the reanimator problem, in: Monatsschrift f\u00fcr Deutsches Recht, 1992, 621-629.<\/li>\n
        • \u201cFocus of reproachability” and the demarcation of doings and omissions, in: Juristische Schulung, 1993, 23-29.<\/li>\n
        • Disputed issues of psychological assistance in criminal law, in: Juristische Ausbildung, 1993, 11-17.<\/li>\n
        • Sporne kwestie odpowiedzialnosci karnej za pomocnictwo do czynu zabronionego w niemieckim prawie karnym, in: Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska Lublin-Polonia, Vol. XXXIX, Sectio G, 1992, 253-270.<\/li>\n
        • The meaning of the \u201cFocus phrase\u201d in demarcation of doing and omission in the understanding of case law, in: Das Juristische B\u00fcro, 1993, 198-202.<\/li>\n
        • The legal-ontological distinction of the forms of behaviour positive doing and omission, in: Goltdammer\u2019s Archive of criminal law, 1993, 262-275.<\/li>\n
        • Measures to combat EC subsidy fraud, in: Europa-sheets, 1993, nos. 4, 6-16.<\/li>\n
        • The costs decision in the lawsuit enforcement proceedings in the special case of the “investigator enforcement”, in: Das Juristische B\u00fcro, 1993, 643-645.<\/li>\n
        • The protection of EU financial interests by the German criminal and administrative offence law, in: Europ\u00e4ische Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Wirtschaftsrecht, 1994, 304-309.<\/li>\n
        • Overview of the jurisprudence for the protection of foreign legal interests by the German criminal law, in particular in the area of statement and documentary frauds, in: Juristische Arbeitsbl\u00e4tter, 1994, Heft 6, 76-81.<\/li>\n
        • The return sale of a stolen item to its owner by a third party, in: Juristische Ausbildung, 1995, 113-124.<\/li>\n
        • Rule of law limits for the criminal investigation of the death shots at the inner German border. At the same time a discussion of BGH, judgement v. 20.03.1995 – 5 StR 111\/94 (LG Berlin) = BGHSt 41, 101, in: Juristen-Zeitung, 1996, 490-494 (together with Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dannecker).<\/li>\n
        • Psychopathology of the fraudster. Or: Intelligence perpetrators act per se culpably?, in: Kriminalistik, 1998, 180-185.<\/li>\n
        • Again: On the need for a reform of the retrial of criminal proceedings, in: Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Rechtspolitik, 1998, 173-178.<\/li>\n
        • The demarcation of doing and omission in the newer jurisprudence – a record in BGHSt. 40, 257 -, in: Juristische Ausbildung, 1998, 580-583.<\/li>\n
        • The application of \u00a7 1904 BGB on the custodial approval in the case of euthanasia, in: Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Lebensrecht, 1999, 90-98.<\/li>\n
        • The most important aspects of the tax criminal self-report, in: Sparkasse, 2002, 402-408 (together with attorney Christian Landowski).<\/li>\n
        • Limitation of aid for tax evasion, in: Defence Lawyer Forum, 2005, 228-233 (together with Attorney Christian Landowski).<\/li>\n
        • Law enforcement can be pre-empted through self-disclosure, in: Oldenburgische Wirtschaft, 2007, Issue 3, 22-23 (together with attorney Christian Landowski).<\/li>\n
        • Introduction of “crisis management” in companies with regard to possible criminal proceedings, in: wistra 2009, 379-384 (also a habilitation lecture).<\/li>\n
        • Infidelity through commitment to take over financial sanctions and defense costs, in: Juristische Rundschau, 2010, 239-248 (at the same time inaugural lecture).<\/li>\n
        • The criminal relevance of unfair-inadequate examination of expert\u2019s assessments by judges. As displayed through the judgement of the BGH on the collapse of the roof of the Bad Reichenhaller Eissporthalle, in: Der Sachverst\u00e4ndige, 2010, 260-263.<\/li>\n
        • Corruption prevention through organizational compliance, in: Rolf Stober (pub.), Corruption prevention as a challenge for the economy. Results of the 1st Tages der Unternehmenssicherheit, Hamburg, 2011, 47-57.<\/li>\n
        • Scope of liability of submission agreements, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2012, 3270-3274 (together with attorney Jens M\u00f6ckel).<\/li>\n
        • Participating rights in the criminal procedure adhesion proceedings, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2013, 830-832 (together with attorney Jens M\u00f6ckel).<\/li>\n
        • Attendance rights of the defense attorney in witness hearings during the preliminary investigation, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2013, 1495-1497.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

          III. Comments on judgement<\/h3>\n
            \n
          • Higher Regional Court Hamm, order of 03.12.1991 – 1 Ws 619\/91 (Criminal procedure code: Admissibility of the enforcement order), in: Juristische Arbeitsbl\u00e4tter, 1993, 158-160.<\/li>\n
          • Federal constitution court (2nd Chamber of the 2nd Senate), decision of 16.04.1992 – 2 BvR 877\/89 (criminal procedure law: Requirements for a enforcement order), in: Neue Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Strafrecht, 1993, 497-499.<\/li>\n
          • BayObLG, Decision of 30.12.1992 – 4 StR 170\/92 (Criminal Law: Personal injury by prescribing a drug to dependent persons), in: Defence Attorney, 1993, 642-645 (together with Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dannecker).<\/li>\n
          • ECJ, judgement of 27.10.1992 – Rs C-240\/92 (European Law: Competence of the European Community and the Commission to introduce sanctions), in: Legal worksheets, 1994, 131-134.<\/li>\n
          • Higher Regional Court D\u00fcsseldorf, Decision of 17.11.1992 – 2 Ss 337\/92 – 67\/92 III (Criminal Law: Passing the cash register with “hidden” goods in the self-service shop), in: Juristische Rundschau, 1994, 205-207.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

            <\/div><\/div>\n

            <\/p>\n

            Comments on judgement (continued)<\/h3>\n
              \n
            • BGH, Order of 17.03.2003 – XII ZB 2\/03 (Family Law: The decisiveness of the will expressed in the context of a so-called “living will” to stop life-sustaining measures), in: Deutsche Notar-Zeitschrift, 2003, 855-861.<\/li>\n
            • BGH, Decision of 17.07.2009 – 5 StR 394\/08 (Criminal Law: Guarantor duties of the internal audit director of a public-law institution – Excessive street cleaning fees), in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2009, 3176-3177.<\/li>\n
            • BGH, judgement of 27.11.2009 – 2 StR 104\/09 (Criminal Law: Officials of a Broadcasting Chief Editor), in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2010, 789.<\/li>\n
            • BGH, Decision of 27.01.2010 – 5 StR 224\/09 (Criminal Law: Special advantage and expiry in case of prohibited insider business – freenet), in: Neue Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Gesellschaftsrecht, 2010, 352.<\/li>\n
            • Higher Regional Court Hamburg, Decision of 19.12.2011 – 2 Ws 123\/11 (Criminal Law: Removal of dental gold after cremation of the deceased), in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2012, 1607-1608.<\/li>\n
            • BGH, Decision of 10.01.2012 – 3 StR 400\/11 (Criminal Law: Refusal of judges for fear of bias), in: StrafRechtsReport, 2012, 221-223 (together with attorney Jens M\u00f6ckel).<\/li>\n
            • BGH, judgement of 13.08.2014 – 2 StR 573\/13 (criminal law: In sub-authorization signed reasons for appeal by the joint plaintiff), in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2014, 3320-3323.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

              IV. Case discussions<\/h3>\n
                \n
              • Exercise Homework Criminal Law: A day in the life of the lifeguard A, in: Juristische Ausbildung, 1993, 376-380.<\/li>\n
              • The practical case – criminal law: Failure with consequences, in: Juristische Schulung, 1993, 837-842.<\/li>\n
              • Exam Criminal Law: Burglary with unpleasant consequences, in: Juristische Arbeitsbl\u00e4tter, 1994, Heft 6, 35-49.<\/li>\n
              • The practical case – criminal law: Repentant terrorists, in: Juristische Schulung, 1994, 948-954.<\/li>\n
              • Written exam with solution in the subject criminal law, in: Kriminalistik, 1999, 351-356.<\/li>\n
              • The practical case – criminal law: \u201cJehovah’s Witnesses”, in: Juristische Schulung, 2000, 986-991 (together with trainee lawyer Marc Murray).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                V. Book reviews<\/h3>\n
                  \n
                • Rebmann\/Roth\/Herrmann, law on administrative offences. Comment. 2nd Edition. Loose-leaf edition. 4th Delivery (version: January 1992). Stuttgart, Berlin, Cologne, 1989, in: Administrative sheets for Baden-W\u00fcrttemberg, 1993, 277-280.<\/li>\n
                • Christoph Sowada, The “necessary participation” as a functional privilege model in criminal law, Berlin, 1992, in: Goltdammer\u2019s Archive of criminal law, 1994, 293-296.<\/li>\n
                • Frank Tiemann, the extended burden of proof of the applicant in the criminal retrial. Heidelberg, 1993, in: Goltdammer\u2019s Archive of criminal law, 1994, 293-296.<\/li>\n
                • Klaus Marxen\/Frank Tiemann, the retrial in criminal matters. Heidelberg, 1996, in: Goltdammer\u2019s Archive of criminal law, 1995, 289-292.<\/li>\n
                • Wessels, Johannes, Criminal Law – General Section, 26th Edition. Heidelberg, 1996; ders., Criminal Law – Special Part\/1, 20th Edition. Heidelberg, 1996; ders., Criminal Law – Special Part\/2, 19th Edition. Heidelberg, 1996, in: Juristische Ausbildung,
                  \n1997, 503-504.<\/li>\n
                • K\u00fcrzinger, Josef, criminology. An Introduction to the doctrine of crime. 2nd Edition. Stuttgart, 1996, in: Juristische Ausbildung, 1998, 280.<\/li>\n
                • G\u00f6ssel, Karl-Heinz, Criminal Law – Special part, Vol. 2: Offences against material legal interests of the individual. Heidelberg, 1996, in: Juristische Ausbildung, 1998, 391.<\/li>\n
                • Kurt Rebann\/Werner Roth\/Siegfried Herrmann, Law on misdemeanors, comment. 2nd edition 7th Delivery (version: March 1996), Stuttgart, in: Administrative sheets for Baden-W\u00fcrttemberg, 1998, 479-480.<\/li>\n
                • Schroth, Ulrich, Criminal Law, Special Section. Exam relevant knowledge with incorporation of 6. Criminal law reform act and recent jurisprudence; structures, construction schemes, definitions for the new special part. 2nd Edition. Stuttgart, Munich, Hanover, Berlin, Weimar, Dresden, 1998, in: Juristische Ausbildung, 1999, 391.<\/li>\n
                • Scholl, Ferdinand Eckbert, criminal liability of local authority, councillors and members of the administration association in environmental law – \u00a7\u00a7 324, 326 para. 1, 327 para. 2 No. 3 StGB – Schorndorf, 1996, in: Administrative sheets for Baden-W\u00fcrttemberg, 1999, 439-440.<\/li>\n
                • Keppler, Karlheinz\/St\u00f6ver, Heino (ed.), Medicine in prisons. Medical care under prison conditions. Stuttgart, New York, 2009, in: Recht & Psychiatrie, 2009, 225-226.<\/li>\n
                • Hassemer, Winfried\/Kempf, Eberhard\/Moccia, Sergio (pub.), In dubio pro libertate. Anniversary publication for Klaus Volk on his 65th birthday. Munich, 2009, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2010, 353.<\/li>\n
                • Neidhart, Hermann\/Nissen, Michael, catalogue of fines in Europe. Traffic tickets in 20 travel countries. Bonn, 2013, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2013, 3626.<\/li>\n
                • Fischer, Thomas, Penal Code, Commentary, 62nd edition, Munich, 2015, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2015, 1162.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                  VI. Others<\/h3>\n
                    \n
                  • Summary of the panel discussion, in: Gerhard Dannecker (pub.), The fight against subsidy fraud in the EC area, Cologne, 1993, 206-211.<\/li>\n
                  • Summary of the panel discussion, in: Gerhard Dannecker (ed.), Food law offences and Administrative sanctions in the European Union, Cologne, 1994, 247-259.<\/li>\n
                  • Opinion on the \u201cBill of the Federal Council – Draft of a law reforming the penal right of resumption of legal proceedings, BT Printed 16\/7957\u201d for the public hearing of the committee on legal affairs on March 18, 2009, 2 pm, in: German Bundestag, 16th Election period, Legal Affairs Committee (6th Committee), Protocol No. 130, 2010, 105-114.<\/li>\n
                  • Position. \u201cStalking\u201d – how (un) protected is the victim?, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2010, NJW-current, Issue 1-2, 16.<\/li>\n
                  • Readers Forum: Petermann, NJW 2013, 1054, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2013, NJW-current, Issue 18, 10<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                    <\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                    Jens M\u00f6ckel Dr. habil. Kristian F. Stoffers<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":5,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"generate_page_header":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-628","page","type-page","status-publish"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.strafverteidiger-oldenburg.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.strafverteidiger-oldenburg.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.strafverteidiger-oldenburg.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.strafverteidiger-oldenburg.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.strafverteidiger-oldenburg.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=628"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.strafverteidiger-oldenburg.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/628\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.strafverteidiger-oldenburg.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}